Mississippi Supreme Court· 6/25/1973
Smith v. State
Citations
- 279 So. 2d 652
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that, without more, the defendant’s statement to a third party, which directed the third party to tell a juror there might be a future reward, failed to constitute an overt act necessary for attempt to commit bribery
- finding that, without more, the defendant’s statement to a third party, which directed the third party to tell a juror there might be a future reward, failed to constitute an overt act necessary for attempt to commit bribery
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gillespie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. OttoIdaho Supreme Court· 1981-04-09· cited 51×
- West v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1983-09-28· cited 37×
- United States v. ChurchU S Air Force Court of Military Review· 1989-10-26· cited 7×
- Gray v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1980-11-12· cited 4×
- Whitney Glenn Ishee v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 1998-07-21
- Joanie Tiachella Calloway v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2019-03-05
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.