Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 279 So. 2d 652

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that, without more, the defendant’s statement to a third party, which directed the third party to tell a juror there might be a future reward, failed to constitute an overt act necessary for attempt to commit bribery
  • finding that, without more, the defendant’s statement to a third party, which directed the third party to tell a juror there might be a future reward, failed to constitute an overt act necessary for attempt to commit bribery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillespie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.