· 5/13/2002
Smith v. South Carolina Insurance
Citations
- 564 S.E.2d 358
- 350 S.C. 82
- 2002 S.C. App. LEXIS 70
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \We hold the addition of a new vehicle is a 'change' to an existing policy as contemplated by [section] 38-77-350(C) and thus a new offer of UIM coverage is not mandated.\
- finding the addition of a second vehicle an immaterial change
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Cureton, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.