Skip to main content
· 3/11/1999

Smith v. Smith Ex Rel. Clarke

Citations

  • 747 A.2d 85
  • 1999 Del. Ch. LEXIS 243
  • 1999 WL 160168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ―Common law has established the principle that where language creating a future interest is susceptible to two interpretations, one in compliance and one in violation of the rule against perpetuities, the former shall be chosen.‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.