Michigan Court of Appeals· 5/26/2011
Smith v. Smith
Citations
- 292 Mich. App. 699
- 823 N.W.2d 114
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “When a court interprets a contract, the entire contract must be read and construed as a whole. All the parts must be harmonized as much as possible, and each word of the contract must be given effect, if possible.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mamey, Markey, Meter, Owens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Harbor Park Market, Inc v. GrondaMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-01-07· cited 81×
- Hamade v. Sunoco, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals· 2006-05-25· cited 67×
- MacInnes v. MacInnesMichigan Court of Appeals· 2004-04-02· cited 35×
- Keyser v. KeyserMichigan Court of Appeals· 1990-02-05· cited 21×
- Hamade v. SUNOCO, INC.(R & M)Michigan Court of Appeals· 2006-08-28· cited 19×
- Marshall v. MarshallMichigan Court of Appeals· 1984-06-28· cited 14×
- Zeer v. ZeerMichigan Court of Appeals· 1989-08-21· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.