Smith v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court erred when making its ability to pay determination by not considering all sources of income available to husband

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Whitt v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1998-04-03· cited 28×
• Yangco v. Yangco
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-13· cited 10×
• Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-07· cited 7×
• Threadgill v. Nishimura
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-06-28· cited 4×
• Newman v. Newman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-31· cited 4×
• Smith v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-27· cited 4×
• Mills v. Mills
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-06· cited 2×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Amendments to Rules of Civ. Proc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-12-30· cited 16×
• Lutgert v. Lutgert
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-08-02· cited 13×