Smith v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]here a document on its face is properly subscribed and bears the acknowledgment of a notary public, it gives rise to a presumption of due execution, which may be rebutted only upon a showing of clear and convincing evidence to the contrary.” (quotation and brackets omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. Smith
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-11-02· cited 250×
• Lounsbury v. Lounsbury
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-12-12· cited 39×
• Leighton v. Leighton
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-12-06· cited 9×
• Stearns v. Stearns
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-10-21· cited 8×
• Doukas v. Doukas
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2008-01-22· cited 8×
• In re the Estate of Levinson
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-10-28· cited 6×
• Demblewski v. Demblewski
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-12-30· cited 5×
• In the Matter of Matthew Kamil and Robin Kamil
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2020-07-10
• Ryerson v. Ryerson
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2023-11-02

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re Aho
  New York Court of Appeals· 1976-04-06· cited 5,625×
• Matisoff v. Dobi
  New York Court of Appeals· 1997-05-08· cited 586×
• Spilky v. La Lone
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1996-05-09· cited 18×
• Hazell v. Board of Elections
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1996-02-14· cited 9×
• Hargett v. Green
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-10-26· cited 4×