Skip to main content

Smith v. Smith

Citations

  • 293 Ga. 563
  • 748 S.E.2d 456
  • 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 2800
  • 2013 WL 4779608
  • 2013 Ga. LEXIS 654

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in divorce case using same test for newly discovered evidence, husband lacked due diligence because he did not cross-examine wife at trial
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying husband’s motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence of wife’s adultery where husband had opportunity to engage in discovery concerning the possibility of alleged adultery and he chose not to
  • “The purpose of civil contempt is to 10 2. Appellants also argue that the trial court committed multiple procedural errors in awarding sanctions because it failed to (a) provide sufficient notice of its intent to sanction them and hold an evidentiary hearing, (b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.