Smith v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• civil contempt \must be proved by clear and convincing evidence\ based on totality of circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Feinstein v. Feinstein
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2019-05-02· cited 4×
• GERALDINE GRIFFIN v. HARRY MICHAEL KAY.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2022-06-15· cited 3×
• Piwowarczyk v. Piwowarczyk
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2019-08-16
• Voorhis v. Relle
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2020-02-10
• Franchi v. Franchi
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2019-01-30
• JANE K. FURNAS v. CATHLEEN M. CIRONE, personal representative.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2023-01-09

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Turnpike Motors, Inc. v. Newbury Group, Inc.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-07-16· cited 108×
• Birchall
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2009-09-23· cited 100×
• Schuler v. Schuler
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-01-27· cited 90×
• Pierce v. Pierce
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2009-11-09· cited 86×
• Chin v. Merriot
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2015-01-30· cited 57×
• Hassey v. Hassey
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2014-06-25· cited 28×
• Wooters v. Wooters
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2009-08-18· cited 27×
• Binder v. Binder
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1979-06-15· cited 21×
• Brash v. Brash
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-03-20· cited 21×
• Poras v. Pauling
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2007-10-19· cited 20×
• Kelley v. Kelley
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2005-10-11· cited 17×
• Bullock v. Zeiders
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1981-11-23· cited 14×
• L.F. v. L.J.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2008-05-30· cited 11×
• Griffith v. Griffith
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-06-22· cited 10×
• Rosenwasser v. Rosenwasser
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2016-06-17· cited 6×