Smith v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the cause of action “only limits reimbursement to three years prior to the filing of the action”
• noting that the cause of action “only limits reimbursement to three years prior to the filing of the action”
• “Affidavits are acceptable means by which a party can establish” past expenditures for a child
• “Affidavits are acceptable means by which a party can establish” past expenditures for a child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kabasan v. Kabasan
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-01-16· cited 13×
• Scoggin v. Scoggin
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-10-18· cited 8×
• Wise v. Wise
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-04-02· cited 8×
• Peeler v. Joseph
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-12-18· cited 3×
• Stowe v. Stowe
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-07-07
• Jain v. Jain
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2022-06-21
• Clute v. Gosney
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2023-09-12

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-24· cited 1,233×
• Warren v. Warren
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2006-01-17· cited 20×
• Sloop v. Friberg
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 1984-10-16· cited 18×