Smith v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vehicle purchased by husband after the dissolution action was filed, but before entry of final judgment, was not marital property for purposes of equitable distribution
• “[A]n order which only determines the right to attorney’s fees without setting the amount is a nonappealable, nonfinal order.” (quoting McIlveen v. McIlveen, 644 So.2d 612, 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Librizzi v. Librizzi
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-06-09· cited 3×
• Pulling v. Billmyre Enterprises, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-26· cited 1×
• HUMPHREY IGBERAESE v. VILLAGE OF STONEYBROOK, I I ASSOCIATION, INC.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-03-28
• Lindsay Wallace v. Andrew Wallace
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-07-23

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McIlveen v. McIlveen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-09· cited 34×
• Fortune v. Fortune
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-04-27· cited 18×
• Card v. Card
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-20· cited 14×
• Broadway v. Broadway
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-02-21· cited 1×