Smith v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 362(a) does not bar a creditor from renewing a lien but that § 108(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kyne v. Eustice
  California Court of Appeal· 1963-05-02· cited 38×
• Ogle v. Heim
  California Supreme Court· 1968-07-10· cited 31×
• Thomas v. Thomas
  California Court of Appeal· 1961-06-06· cited 19×
• Charles Daff v. Karen Good
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-10-22· cited 8×
• In Re Finn
  California Court of Appeal· 1957-12-03· cited 7×
• Parscal v. Parscal
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-11-17· cited 2×
• Hearst v. Hearst
  N.D. California· 1954-08-04· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canfield v. Security-First National Bank
  California Supreme Court· 1939-03-01· cited 62×
• Adams v. Hackett
  California Supreme Court· 1857-07-01· cited 34×
• Herrlich v. Kaufmann
  California Supreme Court· 1893-08-11· cited 33×
• Pacific Bank v. Robinson
  California Supreme Court· 1881-07-01· cited 28×
• High v. Bank of Commerce
  California Supreme Court· 1892-07-23· cited 16×
• Habenicht v. Lissak
  California Supreme Court· 1889-03-08· cited 15×
• Staples v. May
  California Supreme Court· 1890-12-18· cited 12×
• Smith v. Smith
  California Court of Appeal· 1935-05-29· cited 10×