Skip to main content

Smith v. Smith

Citations

  • 934 So. 2d 636
  • 2006 WL 2135877

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding former husband's demonstrative aid and legal argument to be insufficient to support pension calculation
  • holding former husband's demonstrative aid and legal argument to be insufficient to support pension calculation
  • finding the trial court abused its discretion where “there was no evidence that the CitiFinancial card and the ChartWay Visa were used for the Wife’s husband-free vacation or for any improper purpose”
  • \A demonstrative aid together with argument does not provide an evidentiary basis for a finding as to valuation of a pension.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fulmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.