Smith v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “after a motion for summary judgment is filed and scheduled, non-moving parties cannot thwart the summary judgment hearing by initiating discovery”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Payne v. CUDJOE GARDENS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-18· cited 10×
• Vancelette v. Boulan South Beach Condominium Assoc., Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-06-21· cited 5×
• Cohen v. Cohen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-06-23· cited 4×
• Harper v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-03-14· cited 3×
• Ray's Plumbing Contractors, Inc. v. Trujillo Construction, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-18· cited 1×
• BOBBIE JO RODRIGUEZ v. AVATAR PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-10-02
• DOMINGO SACRAMENTO v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-06-22

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Singer v. Star
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-07-29· cited 35×
• SPOLSKI GEN. CONTR. v. Jett-Aire Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-06-03· cited 23×
• UFF DAA, INC. v. Towne Realty, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-12-22· cited 10×
• Sica v. Sam Caliendo Design, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-09-15· cited 8×
• Villages at Mango Key Homeowners Ass'n v. Hunter Development, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-26· cited 6×
• Abbate v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-09· cited 4×