Skip to main content

Smith v. Smith

Citations

  • 544 S.W.2d 121
  • 20 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 91
  • 1976 Tex. LEXIS 261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellant “established his right to a retrial of [the] case because of his inability to procure” reporter’s record
  • holding that appellant “established his right to a retrial of [the] case because of his inability to procure a statement of facts [now called a reporter’s record]”
  • where in a divorce case, there was no statement of facts, the judgment was invalid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steakley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.