Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2/10/2006
Smith v. Smith
Citations
- 235 S.W.3d 1
- 2006 WL 140577
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring jury unanimity on elements of offense, i.e., actus reus, but not on alternative means of committing offense
- collecting cases recognizing that undercapitalization is a significant factor in determining substantive veil-piercing.
- We do not “search the record to find where it may provide support for [a party’s] contentions.”
- “[S]ome property may have both marital and nonmarital components by virtue of the fact that it was purchased with a -11- combination of marital and nonmarital funds.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barber, Minton, Taylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ford v. FordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2019-05-10· cited 57×
- Jones v. LivesayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2018-06-01· cited 55×
- Maclean v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2014-01-03· cited 23×
- Shafizadeh v. ShafizadehCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2012-12-14· cited 22×
- Dennis v. FulkersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2011-06-24· cited 21×
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2014-05-23· cited 17×
- Allison v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2008-02-15· cited 16×
- Cobane v. CobaneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2018-03-23· cited 15×
- Rearden v. ReardenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2009-10-09· cited 11×
- King v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2012-09-28· cited 9×
- Marriage of Angell v. AngellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-12-29· cited 5×
- O'Rourke v. Lexington Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2011-10-07· cited 4×
- Mattingly v. FidanzaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2013-09-13· cited 3×
- Miller v. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2013-09-27· cited 3×
- Ferguson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2011-06-24· cited 2×
- Estate of Mills v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2015-07-02· cited 2×
- Haley v. HaleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-11· cited 1×
- State of Tennessee v. Mario Bateman a.k.a. Mario WoodsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2008-10-28
- Day v. DayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2009-12-11
- Mark Mabry v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2014-09-11
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.