Skip to main content

Smith v. Smith

Citations

  • 235 S.W.3d 1
  • 2006 WL 140577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring jury unanimity on elements of offense, i.e., actus reus, but not on alternative means of committing offense
  • collecting cases recognizing that undercapitalization is a significant factor in determining substantive veil-piercing.
  • We do not “search the record to find where it may provide support for [a party’s] contentions.”
  • “[S]ome property may have both marital and nonmarital components by virtue of the fact that it was purchased with a -11- combination of marital and nonmarital funds.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barber, Minton, Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.