Smith v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “On remand, the circuit court has, in effect, two options: first, to maintain the allotment procedure ...; or, second, to abandon the allotment procedure and proceed with a judicial sale.”
• “Our cases do agree that a court does have rather broad discretion in deciding whether to accept a bid to ensure that a judicial sale is fairly conducted to bring the best possible price.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Burnside v. Burnside
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1995-03-31· cited 186×
• David Earl Bowyer v. Deborah L. Wyckoff
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2017-01-26· cited 13×
• State ex rel. Bowser v. Hill
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2001-04-30

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Patterson v. Patterson
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-05-05· cited 62×
• Consolidated Gas Supply Corp. v. Riley
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1978-07-11· cited 50×
• Gillmor v. Gillmor
  Utah Supreme Court· 1982-12-03· cited 18×
• Dodd v. Hinton
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1984-01-27· cited 11×
• Stillings v. Stillings
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-07-27· cited 10×
• Tuttle v. Tuttle
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1985-01-14· cited 9×
• State v. Hatfield
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1951-11-13· cited 9×
• Corrothers v. Jolliffe
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1889-06-27· cited 8×
• Myers v. Myers
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1986-04-04· cited 6×
• Maxwell v. Stalnaker
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1957-03-05· cited 5×
• Koay v. Koay
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1987-06-11· cited 4×
• Wachter v. Wachter
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1987-03-11· cited 3×