Skip to main content

Smith v. Smith

Citations

  • 226 P.2d 279
  • 68 Nev. 10
  • 1951 Nev. LEXIS 61

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that because “the unclean hands maxim is one founded on public policy, public policy may require its relaxation”
  • concluding that the district court did not have jurisdiction in equity \where statutes in force required [the party] to seek his relief in another way\
  • concluding that the district court did not have jurisdiction in equity \where statutes in force required [the party] to seek his relief in another way\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Badt, Eather, Merrill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.