Nevada Supreme Court· 1/10/1951
Smith v. Smith
Citations
- 226 P.2d 279
- 68 Nev. 10
- 1951 Nev. LEXIS 61
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that because “the unclean hands maxim is one founded on public policy, public policy may require its relaxation”
- concluding that the district court did not have jurisdiction in equity \where statutes in force required [the party] to seek his relief in another way\
- concluding that the district court did not have jurisdiction in equity \where statutes in force required [the party] to seek his relief in another way\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Badt, Eather, Merrill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wilmington Trust FSB v. A1 Concrete Cutting & Demolition, LLCNevada Supreme Court· 2012-10-25· cited 41×
- Las Vegas Fetish & Fantasy Halloween Ball, Inc. v. Ahern Rentals, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court· 2008-05-08· cited 31×
- Howard v. HowardNevada Supreme Court· 1952-01-17· cited 16×
- Moore v. MooreNevada Supreme Court· 1959-04-01· cited 12×
- Farley v. FarleyUtah Supreme Court· 1967-08-16· cited 8×
- In Re Burns, for a Writ of Habeas CorpusHawaii Supreme Court· 1965-11-03· cited 8×
- Aldabe v. AldabeNevada Supreme Court· 1968-06-07· cited 8×
- Moore v. MooreNevada Supreme Court· 1962-04-09· cited 4×
- First National Bank v. CondosNevada Supreme Court· 1954-02-01· cited 1×
- BENSON VS. STATE ENGINEERNevada Supreme Court· 2015-09-24
- STATE ENGINEER VS. HAPPY CREEK, INC.Nevada Supreme Court· 2019-09-12
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- New York Life Insurance v. DunlevySupreme Court· 1916-06-05· cited 100×
- Century Distilling Co. v. Continental Distilling Co.Third Circuit· 1939-06-30· cited 48×
- Hollingshead v. HollingsheadNew Jersey Court of Chancery· 1920-02-27· cited 39×
- Ex Parte Indiana Transportation Co.Supreme Court· 1917-06-11· cited 32×
- State ex rel. Sparrenberger v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court· 1923-03-22· cited 30×
- Hall v. HallMontana Supreme Court· 1924-05-19· cited 27×
- Lippincott v. LippincottNebraska Supreme Court· 1942-03-27· cited 27×
- Confer v. District CourtNevada Supreme Court· 1925-04-06· cited 21×
- Anglim v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1932-01-07· cited 21×
- Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. SmootD.C. Circuit· 1945-12-17· cited 19×
- Carlisle v. CarlisleMichigan Supreme Court· 1893-06-16· cited 19×
- United Drug Co. v. KovacsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1924-01-07· cited 18×
- State ex rel. Howe v. MoranNevada Supreme Court· 1914-07-15· cited 12×
- Axtell v. AxtellSupreme Court of Georgia· 1936-10-14· cited 10×
- Gibbs v. GibbsUtah Supreme Court· 1903-08-15· cited 10×
- Weiss v. AhrensColorado Court of Appeals· 1913-09-15· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.