Skip to main content

Smith v. Smith

Citations

  • 93 S.W.3d 871
  • 2002 Tenn. App. LEXIS 622
  • 2002 WL 1974132

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating a presumption of transmutation arises from one spouse adding the other spouse’s name to a financial account as a part of a joint account
  • no commingling where an accountant “determine[d] the value of the accounts that was attributable to” separate property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge David R. Farmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.