Skip to main content
· 5/28/1896

Smith v. Shoenberger

Citations

  • 176 Pa. 95
  • 34 A. 954
  • 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1047

Syllabus

<p>Judgment — Presumption of payment — Evidence—Declarations.</p> <p>On a scire facias to revive a judgment more than twenty years old, whore the defendant relies on the presumption of payment growing out of the lapse of time, declarations of the defendant tending to show that the judgment had not been paid are admissible in evidence, and their persuasive value is for the jury to determine.</p>

Judges: Collum, Dean, Fell, Mitchell, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.