Skip to main content
E.D. New York· 2/17/1994

Smith v. Shalala

Citations

  • 856 F. Supp. 118
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8781
  • 1994 WL 287215

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • substantial evidence analysis also applies to inferences drawn from facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glasser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.