· 8/8/2011
Smith v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Citations
- 653 F.3d 121
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16353
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reiterating that equitable freezing power in enforcement proceeding extends to non-party’s ill-gotten gains
- describing lowered evidentiary burden generally where nothing “more than an asset freeze is in ques tion”
- noting the “sweeping mandate manifest in the securities laws . . . and the district court’s broad equitable power to fashion ancillary relief when its jurisdiction under those law has been involved”
- “In this jurisdiction, injunctions sought by the SEC do not require a showing of irreparable harm or the unavailability of remedies at law.”
- discussing such relief in context of alleged securities violations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pooler, Raggi, Koeltl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.