Skip to main content
· 8/8/2011

Smith v. Securities & Exchange Commission

Citations

  • 653 F.3d 121
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reiterating that equitable freezing power in enforcement proceeding extends to non-party’s ill-gotten gains
  • describing lowered evidentiary burden generally where nothing “more than an asset freeze is in ques tion”
  • noting the “sweeping mandate manifest in the securities laws . . . and the district court’s broad equitable power to fashion ancillary relief when its jurisdiction under those law has been involved”
  • “In this jurisdiction, injunctions sought by the SEC do not require a showing of irreparable harm or the unavailability of remedies at law.”
  • discussing such relief in context of alleged securities violations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pooler, Raggi, Koeltl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.