Skip to main content

Smith v. Royce W. Day Co.

Citations

  • 242 A.D.2d 394
  • 661 N.Y.S.2d 101
  • 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8440

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to extend Robinson 's substantial modification defense to plaintiff’s claim that a manufacturer failed to provide explicit warnings that a forklift was not to be used without the original platform
  • “the adequacy of the warnings is a question of fact for the jury”
  • \the adequacy of the warnings is a question of fact for the jury\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.