Smith v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a party’s request to take “trial depositions” after the close of discovery, and noting the refusal to distinguish between discovery and trial depositions “is the widely accepted view by federal courts throughout the country.” (citations omitted)
• rejecting request to take trial depositions beyond the discovery period
• rejecting request to take trial depositions beyond the discovery period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Smith v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Smith v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-24