Smith v. Rock Island, A. & L. R.
Citations
- 119 La. 537
- 44 So. 290
- 1907 La. LEXIS 521
Syllabus
<p>1. Pleading — Answer—Amendment—Master and Servant — Injuries to Servant.</p> <p>Where an employé sues his employer for ■damages for personal injuries received through the alleged fault or negligence of the latter, the 'latter can, in an amended answer, set up in defense that the plaintiff assumed the risk of the accident which happened, or that it resulted from the fault of a fellow servant, without changing the issue raised by a general denial. Defendant had the right, under the general is■sue, either by direct evidence, or through cross-examination, to bring out all the facts constituting the res gestee of the accident.</p> <p>•2. Master and Servant — Negligence oe Fellow Servant.</p> <p>The fact that one employe receives injuries hy reason of the act of a fellow workman does not necessarily relieve the employer from legal responsibility for the accident.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 34, Master and Servant, § 352.]</p> <p>3. Same — Dangerous Method oe Work.</p> <p>Where an employer adopts a method of doing his work which involves risks and danger greater than the nature of the work calls for, he should take correspondingly appropriate precautions to guard against the increased danger and risks.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For eases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 34, Master and Servant, §§ 269, 270.]</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “it is generally inappropriate to include a legal argument . . . within a complaint”
- concluding that the involvement of the nonsignatory company’s officers in negotiations supported an inference of the company’s intent to be bound by the contract
- concluding that in a brief on a motion to dismiss, a party may not amend its complaint through new allegations but may raise new theories of liability
- dismissing claims where plaintiff acknowledged the issues could not survive and mounted no defense of them
- dismissing claims where plaintiff acknowledged the issues could not survive and mounted no defense of them
- dismissing with prejudice claims that plaintiff had expressly abandoned in his opposition brief
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nicholls
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.