Smith v. Robert R. Sizer & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing pursuant to Rule 41(b) after repeated extensions and two months of noncompliance by counseled plaintiff
• dismissing an action under Rule 41(b) where the plaintiff “repeatedly ignored orders setting deadlines and requiring status letters” and the plaintiff’s response to a court order was “almost two months overdue”
• dismissing an action under Rule 41(b) where the plaintiff “repeatedly ignored orders setting deadlines and requiring status letters” and the plaintiff’s response to a court order was “almost two months overdue”
• dismissing an action for failure to prosecute where the plaintiff had “repeatedly ignored orders setting deadlines and requiring status letters” and her response to a court order was “almost two months overdue”
• dismissing an action for failure to prosecute where the plaintiff had “repeatedly ignored orders setting deadlines and requiring status letters” and her response to a court order was “almost two months overdue”
• dismissing an action for failure to prosecute where the plaintiff had “repeatedly ignored orders setting deadlines and requiring status letters” and her response to a court order was “almost two months overdue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).