Skip to main content
· 8/27/1990

Smith v. Ridgeway Chemicals, Inc.

Citations

  • 395 S.E.2d 742
  • 302 S.C. 303
  • 1990 S.C. App. LEXIS 108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is available to a party suffering an adverse jury verdict only when the same issues were first presented to the trial court in a motion for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence
  • \[A JNOV] motion is available to one suffering an adverse ruling of the jury only when the same issues were submitted to the judge at the directed verdict stage.\
  • “Inasmuch as no motion was made for a directed verdict at the conclusion of the trial, no motion for relief as a matter of law is available after the jury verdict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.