Smith v. Real Estate Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although the petitioner was correct in pointing out the lack of direct evidence supporting the agency’s factual finding, the agency was entitled to infer facts from the evidence in the record, and, under ORS 183.482(7
• although the petitioner was correct in pointing out the lack of direct evidence supporting the agency’s factual finding, the agency was entitled to infer facts from the evidence in the record, and, under ORS 183.482(7), this court would not substitute its judgment for that of the agency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).