Smith v. Premo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that NOD is valid if it expresses \disagreement with an RO's . . . failure to adjudicate [a] claim\ raised to RO
• holding that a Thurber error was not implicated where it was the regional office, not the Board, that failed to inform the claimant that he could respond to a VA medical opinion or submit evidence rebutting that opinion
• holding that a Thurber error was not implicated where it was the regional office, not the Board, that failed to inform the claimant that he could respond to a VA medical opinion or submit evidence rebutting that opinion
• holding that actual knowledge by the veteran cures defect in notice
• discussing, but ultimately dismissing for lack of jurisdiction, a claim for secondary service connection for a gastrointestinal disorder caused by pain medication taken for a service-connected shoulder disability
• recog nizing that NOD is valid if it expresses “disagreement with an RO’s ... failure to adjudicate [a] claim” raised to RO

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).