Smith v. Pistole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting E/C’s argument that JCC erred in ordering payment of $2,000 advance “because there was no evidence of legal entitlement to future benefits from which the E/C could recoup the advance,” and distinguishing cases involving advances of more than $2,000
• affirming order awarding an advance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).