Smith v. Paoli Memorial Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding general surgeon, oncologist, and internist were permitted to testify against gastroenterologist, where each testifying physician could report having experience treating gastrointestinal bleeding and cancers
• permitting a general surgeon, oncologist, and internist to testify about gastrointestinal bleedings and cancer based on their respective GI experiences in their residencies, post-doctoral trainings, and professional publications
• “Decisions regarding admission of expert testimony, like other evidentiary decisions, are within the sound discretion of the trial court.”
• “Decisions regarding the admission of expert testimony, like other evidentiary decisions, are within the sound discretion of the trial court.”
• “Decisions regarding admission of expert testimony, like other evidentiary decisions, are within the sound discretion of the trial court.”
• general surgeon, oncologist and internist competent to testify about gastrointestinal bleeding and cancer based on their respective gastrointestinal experience in residencies, post-doctoral trainings and professional publications

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).