Smith v. Ouzts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the board of education had no authority to agree to limit location of a school building as “any contract which controls or restricts the discretion vested in a public officer or public body is contrary to public policy and void”
• concluding that the board of education had no authority to agree to limit location of a school building as “any contract which controls or restricts the discretion vested in a public officer or public body is contrary to public policy and void”
• “any contract which controls or restricts the discretion vested in a public officer or public body is contrary to public policy and void”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).