· 3/18/1926
Smith v. Ottley
Citations
- 144 Va. 406
- 132 S.E. 512
- 1926 Va. LEXIS 260
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Del Monte Dunes dicta did not control applicability of Nollan/Dolan to Growth Management Act regulations
- holding that Del Monte Dunes dicta did not control applicability of Nollan/Dolan to Growth Management Act regulations
- holding that Del Monte Dunes dicta did not control applicability of Nollan [ v. California Coastal Com'n, 483 U.S. 825, 107 S.Ct. 3141, 97 L.Ed.2d 677 (1987)]/ Dolan [ v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374, 114 S.Ct. 2309, 129 L.Ed.2d 304 (1994
- holding that Del Monte Dunes dicta did not control applicability of Nollan [ v. California Coastal Com'n, 483 U.S. 825, 107 S.Ct. 3141, 97 L.Ed.2d 677 (1987)]/ Dolan [ v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374, 114 S.Ct. 2309, 129 L.Ed.2d 304 (1994)] to Growth Management Act regulations
- \[E]vidence of the best available science must be included in the record and must be considered substantively in the development of critical areas policies and regulations.\ (Emphasis added).
- “[E]vidence of the best available science must be included in the record and must be considered substantively in the development of critical areas policies and regulations.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.