Skip to main content
· 8/15/1966

Smith v. North

Citations

  • 244 Cal. App. 2d 245
  • 53 Cal. Rptr. 94
  • 1966 Cal. App. LEXIS 1566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where a restrictive covenant is “subject to more than one interpretation, that 7 construction consonant with the unencumbered use of the property will be adopted,” and 8 “any doubt therein is resolved against enforcement of the restriction”].
  • covenants specified giving \special import to the view angle\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coughlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.