Skip to main content
· 8/15/1832

Smith v. Noland

Citations

  • 4 La. 280

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant agency violated the APA in \fail[ing] to give the public an opportunity to weigh in with comments\ before attempting to postpone a rule that had already taken effect
  • granting declaratory relief and finding that the DOI's postponement of the Valuation Rule was in violation of the APA
  • vacating rule where the agency \blocked judicial review by obtaining a stay in the [underlying] litigation\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.