Smith v. Network Solutions, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Taken to its logical conclusion, Plaintiffs argument implies that each individual domain name is a relevant market unto itself for antitrust purposes, subject the entity ‘controlling’ the name at a particular time ... to a charge of monopolization.”
• “Taken to its logical conclusion, Plaintiff’s argu- ment implies that each individual domain name is a relevant market unto itself for antitrust purposes, subject the entity ‘controlling’ the name at a particular time . . . to a charge of monopolization.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).