Skip to main content
· 5/22/2006

Smith v. NCCI, INC.

Citations

  • 631 S.E.2d 268
  • 369 S.C. 236
  • 2006 S.C. App. LEXIS 107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent the [Appellate Panel's] findings from being supported by substantial evidence.\
  • “Only issues raised and ruled upon by the commission are cognizable on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Hearn, Goolsby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.