Skip to main content
· 12/18/1989

Smith v. National Distillers and Chemical Corp.

Citations

  • 728 F. Supp. 491
  • 11 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2701
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15963
  • 1989 WL 161399

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that because the two groups of employees were not similarly situated plaintiffs could not sustain an action for breach of fiduciary duty on the basis of preferential treatment between participants
  • retroactive cancellation of past benefits of selected participants is inconsistent with fiduciary duties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Turner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.