Skip to main content
· 10/16/1991

Smith v. Moffett

Citations

  • 947 F.2d 442
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 24402

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, in recognition of Congress's intent, the Supreme Court \assiduously advocate]» federal abstention in favor of tribal courts\
  • finding the tribal exhaustion requirement to not be “a mere defense to be raised or waived by the parties.”
  • “The fact that Smith apparently has not yet presented his case to a tribal court does not diminish the comity considerations present in this case.”
  • “concerns of comity do not present a jurisdictional bar”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.