Smith v. Mitre Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that, in cases involving allegations of retaliation after an MCAD filing, additional filing would serve only to increase costs and delay final resolution
• “blowing the whistle on fraud and false claims by a government contractor — even when that whistleblowing is confined within the company— is sufficiently important to command the invocation of the exception”
• allegation of termination for internal complaint of law violation sufficient to state claim
• employee reported fraud and false claims by government contractor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).