Smith v. Mid-State Nurses, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no trade secret protection of customer lists where sole evidence of efforts to maintain secrecy was oral instruction to maintain confidentiality of other written forms
• “[W]here there is no conflict in the evidence, the [trial] judge’s discretion in granting or denying the interlocutory injunction becomes circumscribed by the applicable rules of law.”
• employer’s customer list held in employee’s memory was not protecta-ble as a trade secret
• employer’s customer list held in employee’s memory was not protecta-ble as a trade secret

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).