Skip to main content
· 1/4/1952

Smith v. Mendonsa

Citations

  • 2026 FLP 1
  • 108 Cal. App. 2d 540
  • 238 P.2d 1039
  • 1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1700

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding 8 Google entitled to injunction where defendant’s breach of contract would “persist unless they are 9 prohibited from doing so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Dyke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.