· 1/4/1952
Smith v. Mendonsa
Citations
- 2026 FLP 1
- 108 Cal. App. 2d 540
- 238 P.2d 1039
- 1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1700
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding 8 Google entitled to injunction where defendant’s breach of contract would “persist unless they are 9 prohibited from doing so.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Van Dyke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.