Skip to main content
· 2/5/1976

Smith v. McCoy

Citations

  • 533 S.W.2d 457
  • 1976 Tex. App. LEXIS 2467

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing a challenge to a county auditor's withholding of approval of a payment and contrasting the circumstances that support a mandamus action against the auditor or a suit against the county
  • “when there is no legal justification for the auditor withholding approval of the claim or payment thereof, mandamus will lie”
  • relator argued on appeal that auditor relied on inapplicable attorney general opinion in denying payment, but failed to introduce evidence in support of allegations at trial
  • relator argued on appeal that auditor relied on inapplicable attorney general opinion in denying payment, but failed to introduce evidence in support of allegations at trial
  • commissioners court's duties to examine and direct payment of claims are nondelegable duties
  • acountyauditorwho acted to deny claims under the statutorypredecessor to section 113.065 “was acting within his official discretion to deny the claims and to require that their validity be established in a court of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Akin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.