Smith v. McClier Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “a staircase is not considered a ‘hazardous opening’ ”
• “a 19 staircase is not considered a ‘hazardous opening’”
• requiring severance after summary judgment stage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Vasquez Ex Rel. Bautista v. GMD Shipyard Corp.
  Second Circuit· 2009-09-15· cited 41×
• Pope v. Safety & Quality Plus, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-06-15· cited 15×
• Godoy v. Baisley Lumber Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-05-22· cited 11×
• Rookwood v. Hyde Park Owners Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2008-02-26· cited 7×
• Lupo v. Pro Foods, LLC
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2009-12-22· cited 7×
• Doomes v. Best Transit Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2015-03-31· cited 2×
• Vasquez v. FCE Industries, Ltd.
  Second Circuit· 2009-09-15
• Lambert v. J.A. Jones Construction Group, LLC
  New York Supreme Court· 2007-07-23

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kanarvogel v. Tops Appliance City, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-04-03· cited 22×
• Frank v. Meadowlakes Development Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1998-12-31· cited 12×
• Transamerica Insurance v. Tolis Inn, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-04-21· cited 8×
• Contrera v. Gesher Realty Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-11-06· cited 2×
• Shea v. 5008 Broadway Associates
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-03-26· cited 1×