Skip to main content
· 10/28/1994

Smith v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.

Citations

  • 256 Kan. 90
  • 883 P.2d 1120
  • 1994 Kan. LEXIS 137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that both employer and supervising co-employee of injured plaintiff owed duty to provide a safe workplace
  • holding that both employer and supervising co-employee of injured plaintiff owed duty to provide a safe workplace
  • when evidence does not conclusively show employee knew or ought to have known of the danger and its consequences, the issue is for the jury
  • “The rule is simply that an employer has the duty not to expose his employees to perils which the employer may guard against by the exercise of reasonable care.”
  • manager of father's farm operation had duty to employee injured in combine
  • manager of father’s farm operation had duty to employee injured in combine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allegrucci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.