· 10/28/1994
Smith v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.
Citations
- 256 Kan. 90
- 883 P.2d 1120
- 1994 Kan. LEXIS 137
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that both employer and supervising co-employee of injured plaintiff owed duty to provide a safe workplace
- holding that both employer and supervising co-employee of injured plaintiff owed duty to provide a safe workplace
- when evidence does not conclusively show employee knew or ought to have known of the danger and its consequences, the issue is for the jury
- “The rule is simply that an employer has the duty not to expose his employees to perils which the employer may guard against by the exercise of reasonable care.”
- manager of father's farm operation had duty to employee injured in combine
- manager of father’s farm operation had duty to employee injured in combine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allegrucci
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.