· 1/27/1969
Smith v. Maresca
Citations
- 393 U.S. 1071
- 89 S. Ct. 731
- 21 L. Ed. 2d 715
- 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2773
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the de novo standard of review applies because the plan administrator did not have the discretion to interpret ambiguous policy language that was at issue
- applying Firestone to dispute over interpretation of sub-rogation clause in ERISA plan
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.