· 7/8/2005
Smith v. Lounsbury (In Re Amberjack Interests, Inc.)
Citations
- 326 B.R. 379
- 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 1282
- 2005 WL 1595293
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a trustee acting on behalf of the estate of a debtor cannot be considered an “individual” for purposes of § 362(k)
- explaining that a trustee acting on behalf of the estate of a debtor cannot be considered an “individual” for purposes of § 362(k)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jeffrey E.T. Bohm
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.