Skip to main content
· 8/16/1995

Smith v. Louis Berkman Co.

Citations

  • 894 F. Supp. 1084
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12506
  • 1995 WL 493383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Boyle defense inapplicable where defendant met state bid specifications for design and sale of salt- spreader machine for State DOT, with no federal involvement
  • “The result is the same under KRS 411.320(1), which mirrors 411.320(2) but applies more broadly to alterations to the product made by any person or entity.”
  • “KRS 411.320 indicates the Kentucky legislature’s intent to benefit product manufacturers by precluding their tort liability when their products are modified or altered by someone else.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heyburn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.