Skip to main content
· 9/1/1998

Smith v. London (In Re Smith)

Citations

  • 224 B.R. 44
  • 40 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1090
  • 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 1091

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that foreclosure sale was void because it violated the automatic stay and the fact that the mortgage company who conducted the foreclosure sale was not given notice of the debtor's bankruptcy filing was irrelevant in determining whether the stay was violated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steven W. Rhodes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.