· 9/1/1998
Smith v. London (In Re Smith)
Citations
- 224 B.R. 44
- 40 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1090
- 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 1091
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that foreclosure sale was void because it violated the automatic stay and the fact that the mortgage company who conducted the foreclosure sale was not given notice of the debtor's bankruptcy filing was irrelevant in determining whether the stay was violated
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steven W. Rhodes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.