Smith v. Logan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that language such as “claims or disputes arising out of, from or relating to this contract” was broad enough to encompass a fraudulent inducement claim and citing case law supporting the same

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 2,844×
• Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.
  Supreme Court· 1962-06-18· cited 857×
• Frank E. Dorton and J. A. Castle, Partners, D/B/A the Carpet Mart v. Collins & Aikman Corporation and Painter Carpet Mills, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 1972-01-06· cited 116×
• U.S. Insulation, Inc. v. Hilro Construction Co.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-08-13· cited 57×
• Quirk v. Data Terminal Systems, Inc.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-02-06· cited 45×
• Norman v. Recreation Centers of Sun City, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-03-10· cited 23×
• Flower World of America, Inc. v. Wenzel
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-11-22· cited 22×
• Keen v. IFG Leasing Co.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-01-14· cited 13×
• Slomkowski v. Craig-Hallum, Inc.
  D. Minnesota· 1986-08-27· cited 9×
• A.G. Edwards & Son, Inc. v. Smith
  D. Arizona· 1989-06-02· cited 1×