California Supreme Court· 4/1/2021
Smith v. LoanMe, Inc.
Citations
- 483 P.3d 869
- 276 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746
- 11 Cal. 5th 183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The interpretation of section 632.7 we adopt is better aligned with the[] aims and declarations [of CIPA] than a narrower interpretation would be.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cahill Construction Co., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2021-07-19
- Jamie Zepeda Labor Contracting v. Department of Industrial etc.California Court of Appeal· 2021-08-12
- People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2021-09-21
- Muskan Food & Fuel, Inc. v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2021-09-27
- Missakian v. Amusement Industry, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2021-09-29
- People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2021-10-05
- People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2021-10-12
- Rodriguez v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal· 2021-10-20
- Rodriguez v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal· 2021-10-26
- Segal v. ASICS America Corp.California Supreme Court· 2022-01-13
- Meyer v. ShehCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2022-02-03
- LaFace v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal· 2022-02-18
- Berroteran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2022-03-07
- People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2022-04-12
- People v. CzirbanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2022-04-27
- Siry Investment, L.People v. FarkhondehpourCalifornia Supreme Court· 2022-07-21
- Cal. Water Curtailment CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2022-09-12
- Espinoza v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal· 2022-09-27
- Cal. Water Curtailment CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2022-09-29
- Untitled California Attorney General OpinionCalifornia Attorney General Reports· 2022-10-27
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 3,700×
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court· 2004-11-09· cited 1,254×
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 1,155×
- Goodman v. LozanoCalifornia Supreme Court· 2010-02-04· cited 239×
- Ribas v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-03-18· cited 199×
- People v. NucklesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2013-04-22· cited 144×
- Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2006-07-13· cited 140×
- Flanagan v. FlanaganCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-03-14· cited 113×
- People v. ManzoCalifornia Supreme Court· 2012-03-08· cited 94×
- Grupe Development Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-02-11· cited 68×
- Sanders v. American Broadcasting CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-06-24· cited 62×
- Warden v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-12-14· cited 58×
- Scher v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court· 2017-06-15· cited 41×
- People v. JimenezCalifornia Supreme Court· 2020-03-02· cited 41×
- People v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court· 2016-05-09· cited 21×
- Forest E. Olson, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1976-10-26· cited 18×
- Brinkley ex rel. Herself v. Monterey Fin. Servs., LLCS.D. California· 2018-09-13· cited 11×
- Ades v. Omni Hotels Management Corp.C.D. California· 2014-09-08· cited 9×
Other cases named Smith v. LoanMe, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.